Vouchers can improve public schools
Given the recent experience in the Davis School District where the viewpoint of parents were considered to be just a nuisance to the process of running the district, I’ve started looking into vouchers. Not so that Norene and I can remove our children from our public schools but to see if a little competition also known as market forces might help parents to receive a little respect from the monopoly of the Davis School District. Here is some of that data:
Vouchers in
• A 2004 Manhattan Institute study published in the journal Education Next found that low-performing schools facing the threat of vouchers made significantly greater test-score gains than similarly low-performing schools not facing the voucher threat. Schools where vouchers were actually offered showed the biggest improvements, outpacing other
• A Cornell University study published in the same issue of that journal found that schools given F grades under the A+ system made greater-than-average gains, while F schools under Florida’s earlier system (with no vouchers) made no gains relative to other schools.
• A 2005
• A 2001
• A 2003 Manhattan Institute study found that fourth grade test score gains were much bigger in schools where more students were eligible for vouchers, such that a school where 100% of students were eligible would have test score gains 15 points higher than a school with only 50% eligible.
Other voucher programs improve public schools
• A 2002 Friedman Foundation study found that under century-old “town tuitioning” voucher programs in Maine and Vermont, public schools closer to tuitioning towns had better test scores. If a town one mile away from a school decided to tuition its students, the percentage of its students passing the state test would increase by 12 percent.
• A 2003 Manhattan Institute study found that a
Source: http://www.utahtaxpayers.org/
0 comments:
Post a Comment